A few days ago, Nathan asked the following question -- which is echoed in a lot of emails I've received from RULE #1 investors:
Mr. Phil Town, I'm struggling with putting a value on a company right now b/c of how much the P/E and the growth rate we use affects the results. Should we stick to your standard way: using either the historical P/E or double the lowest growth rate (b/w historical and analyst projections), whichever is lower? That method is providing pretty high P/E ratios and, therefore, nice and high sticker prices for some companies. Should we slash the P/E ratio used in the calculation given the current market environment? If so, any rule as to how much?
I also wonder about the growth number that we use in the calculation. What should we do when analysts are predicting negative growth in 2009 for Rule #1 companies? Should we still consider it? If so, what number should we use for growth?
Thanks for all your help.
Here is my answer:
Nathan,
Let's go over the process of valuation:
1. Meaning: You've got to know the business.
In a sketchy economic environment like the one we're in, it's even more important.Continue reading "The 4M Valuation Process Still Applies, Even in this Market" »




Recent Comments